Motion to Change the Facts
Posted on July 28, 2007
Filed Under Uncategorized |
Sometimes it’s all you’ve got. [PDF]
Comments
5 Responses to “Motion to Change the Facts”
Leave a Reply
Polls
Loading ...-
-
Subscribe via Email
-
Mack Arnold Trust
Please donate to the Mack Arnold trust fund. BlogRoll
The Latest from Simple Justice
The Latest from A Public DefenderSubscribe through Feedburner
Now Reading
Planned books:
None
Current books:
-
Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas R. Hofstadter
-
The Landmark Herodotus: The Histories by Herodotus
Recent books:
- Deep Survival: Who Lives, Who Dies, and Why by Laurence Gonzales
- The Ten Thousand: A Novel of Ancient Greece by Michael Curtis Ford
- Wilderness Medicine, Beyond First Aid, 5th Edition by William Forgey
- Killing Rommel: A Novel by Steven Pressfield
- World Made by Hand: A Novel by James Howard Kunstler
-
-
Defending People
Defending People is about protecting the people, one at a time, from the only viable threat to their liberty: their government. -
Mark Bennett
"Famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism" - an anonymous prosecutor -
Recent Posts
- Untitled 4
- The Miami Motion to Substitute
- Congratulations!
- Take That, Fort Collins!
- New Harris County Criminal Law Blog
- Guest Post from an Iraq War Veteran
- Anger, Retribution, Oh Crap, Splat.
- Quis custodiet Custodes Ipsos?
- ABA Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System
- Can DUI Be Expunged in Texas?
- Another Mark Bennett
- Thoughts on Independence Day
- DUI No-Refusal Weekend
- The Declaration of Independence
- Not Fail-Safe in the Courthouse
Recent Comments
- Untitled 4 (2)
- Congratulations! (17)
Michael: This 4th of July, I spent Independence Day (in Austin) with a mostly 20- and 30- something crowd of members...
Tarian: That snippet caught my eye, too. I’m not sure what they’re referring to, but I doubt it’s...
Tarian: Mark, that response was disappointing for a lot of reasons, not the least of which were the ad hominem...
Archives
-
Meta


Beautiful!
[...] trying to prevent the government from putting the accused in a box. Sometimes nothing (not even a motion to change the facts) will keep the client out of a box. On those occasions the defender tries to make the box as big as [...]
Champion Magazine, mid ’80’s. Article by Gary Trichter, the Great American Genius-turned-Buffalo Bill. Only needed a one-page motion then, pointing out that since the American system of justice provides for a fair trial, and since the facts in the case at bar are a lay-down for the prosecution, it would simply be Un-American to proceed to trial based on the facts at hand, thereby necessitating a change in facts. It’s short, sweet, generic, and even a New Mexican could read it.
Damn. There really is nothing new under the sun! (I wasn’t reading the Champion back in the mid-80s since, well, I was in high school. . . .)
Mark, don’t feel bad: Trichter, McKinney and Pena all plagiarized (I mean engaged in collaborative writing as we call it after graduating from law school) Trichter in May 1995-you were busy reading that big-assed Texas certificate saying you were finally a real lawyer about then; it’s excusable. Here’s the 1995 quote and cite, though:
In many DUI cases the prosecution has more than enough inculpatory facts which causes the trial to be a one-sided matter. The American system of justice is supposedly premised on the notion that, like baseball, the game should be played fair by two teams that start out on an equal basis. Accordingly, in situations like this, a Motion to Change the Facts is appropriate so that the defendant has a fighting chance. An example of this motion is shown in Exhibit 22 (Yes, this is the authors’ attempt at humor.)
Example 28, Trichter, Gary, McKinney, W. Troy and Pena, Michael, DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE IN DUI CASES, 19 Champion 4, 13 (May, 1995)