top of page
  • bennettandbennett

Conspiracy and Aiding and Abetting: Texas and Federal Law Compared

When two or more people join forces to commit a crime, they can face charges of conspiracy or aiding and abetting. These legal concepts are central to both Texas and federal law, but they have distinct features and implications. This blog post will provide an overview of conspiracy and aiding and abetting in Texas and federal law, highlighting the differences between them.


Conspiracy

In Texas, conspiracy is defined under Section 15.02 of the Texas Penal Code. A person commits the offense of conspiracy if he or she agrees with one or more persons that they will engage in criminal conduct and one of them performs an overt act in pursuance of the agreement. The overt act requirement distinguishes Texas conspiracy law from federal conspiracy law, which does not require an overt act for drug conspiracies.


Under federal law, conspiracy is a separate offense from the underlying crime. The prosecution must prove that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into an agreement to commit a crime, but it is not required to show that the defendant committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, particularly in drug-related cases.


Aiding and Abetting

In Texas, a person can be charged "as a party" under Section 7.02 of the Texas Penal Code if he or she solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid another person to commit a crime. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove that the defendant had the specific intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense.


At the federal level, aiding and abetting is covered under 18 U.S.C. § 2. A person can be charged with aiding and abetting if he or she willfully causes, commands, induces, or procures another person to commit a crime or if he or she aids, counsels, commands, induces, or procures another person to commit a crime.


Key Differences

The main differences between Texas and federal conspiracy and aiding and abetting laws lie in the overt act requirement and the applicable penalties. In Texas, an overt act is required for conspiracy charges, while federal law does not require an overt act for drug conspiracies.


Moreover, the penalties for conspiracy and aiding and abetting differ under Texas and federal law. In Texas, the punishment for conspiracy is generally one category lower than the most serious offense that was the object of the conspiracy. Under federal law, a person convicted of conspiracy or aiding and abetting can face the same penalties as the principal offender.


In conclusion, conspiracy and aiding and abetting are critical aspects of criminal law that can significantly impact the outcome of a case. Understanding the differences between Texas and federal law is essential for anyone facing such charges. If you or a loved one is facing conspiracy or aiding and abetting charges, it's crucial to consult with an experienced Houston criminal-defense lawyer who can provide the best possible defense.

1 view

Recent Posts

See All

Facing false allegations of a sex crime can have severe consequences on your life, including potential imprisonment, damage to your reputation, and long-lasting effects on your personal and profession

bottom of page