Fake Edmund Burke Was Wrong
Some folks like to “quote” Edmund Burke on evil:
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Aside from the fact that the quote is quite bogus (see the link), it’s wrong. In order for evil to triumph, it is not sufficient that good people not act; they must must cooperate. There aren’t enough evil people in the world to overcome the good people without their active help. No evil was ever more than transitory without the positive involvment of good people. The Third Reich would, without the participation of ordinary non-evil folks, have gone no further than beer-hall ranting; Stalin, without the help of misguided people of good will, might have killed hundreds, or maybe tens, instead of millions.
Prosecutors love to pull out the tired fake quote in closing argument, but even when they are dealing with evil (99% of the time they are not) it’s a stupid thing to say.
Which brings us to Maricopa County, Arizona, where Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s henchman, County Attorney Andrew Thomas, has filed a criminal information against Judge Gary Donahoe and where:
The criminal “case” against Donahoe seems to many insiders—including, privately, several prosecutors in Thomas’ own office—a pathetically thin, a politically motivated hit job.
Phoenix New Times, h/t Jeff Gamso.
The County Attorney of neighboring Yavapai County, Sheila Polk, sees Thomas’s prosecution of his and the sheriff’s perceived political enemies as “spreading totalitarianism.” She’s not the only one—listen to my interview of Jim Belanger and read my other posts on the topic, as well as Scott Greenfield’s and Jeff Gamso’s.
For tyranny to succeed, good people must cooperate. The abuse of power to intimidate and punish judges for not toeing the executive’s line is a tool of totalitarians. Those prosecutors in Thomas’s office who privately revealed their feelings about this abuse to the Phoenix New Times are not just doing nothing. By continuing to work for Andy Thomas, and speaking out only privately, they are actively helping evil to propagate.
I’ve had local prosecutors tell me that they would speak out against our local D.A., Pat Lykos, if it weren’t for their family obligations, mortgages, and health insurance. Pat Lykos is very little like Andy Thomas. Requiring employees’ presence at one’s coronation is a far cry from using the power of one’s office to attack one’s political enemies; even when she engages in prosecutions that might be politically motivated, Lykos is not so damn obvious about it, and no prosecutor I know thinks she has done so. Cooperating in the subversion of democracy by undermining the rule of law might well be indefensible in a way that cooperating in one’s own debasement as a human and a professional is not.
Aside from the ethical question, there are practical considerations. These Maricopa County Assistant County Attorneys, casting their lot with Andrew Thomas, are lying down with dogs. If Arpaio and Thomas’s fantastical castle in the sky comes crashing to the ground, those lawyers are going to be remembered as having helped Arpaio and Thomas try to destroy the American system of government in Maricopa County. If Arpaio and Thomas’s delusions of grandeur are proven true—if the judiciary in Maricopa County becomes a lapdog or a nullity—those lawyers will be remembered as having helped Arpaio and Thomas succeed. Neither is a cheerful prognosis for their future outside of a totalitarian future; either way, Maricopa County’s Assistant County Attorneys wake up with fleas.
Speaking of lawyers speaking out against Arpaio and Thomas, today Phoenix independent newsman Nick Martin (Heat City) revealed that Maricopa County Attorney Andy Thomas “just announced he wants two other prosecutors to be investigated for publicly criticizing him.” Conspiracies are convenient: when you believe in a conspiracy against you, everyone who opposes you becomes a conspirator.
Recent PostsSee All
Under section 46.05(a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code, it is a felony to possess, manufacture, transport, repair, or sell a "prohibited weapon," including a chemical dispensing device. Chemical dispensing
What is Online Solicitation of a Minor? Online Solicitation of a Minor is one of two offenses created by sections 33.021(b) and 33.021(c) of the Texas Penal Code: Sec. 33.021. ONLINE SOLICITATION OF
Facing drug-possession charges can be a harrowing experience with potentially severe consequences. To navigate the complex legal system and protect your rights, you'll need a top drug-possession lawye